[Reproduced] is to promote the Government's real intention of rising house prices

 Original Address: The Government's real intention is to promote the rising prices of: dws1122 Although the various media are reported to stabilize prices, said the government, but I never look at the issue of how to say, look at how to do, and these practices to What effect? from the basic principles of economics to analyze the Government's policy is to reduce or to raise prices? because we can not always listen to slogans, sayings and practices are sometimes the opposite, either called talk less to make more here only refers to the real estate prices) the most basic elements: the cost and supply and demand. The basic factors determine the cost of housing higher, the higher the price, because the developer is definitely to make money, and generally have a range of cost profit high cost of their prices will go up. The other is supply and demand, less supply, higher prices, supply more, the lower the price. because the thing to hope for your house a little, and we all have to buy, developers naturally have to raise prices. from the current view of our country's policy are ultimately in higher prices, one is to increase the cost of one is to reduce the supply of the last two control policies are to promote the rising prices, so people doubt, how how regulation will not work? I do not believe that policy makers really do not understand basic principles of economics, even if do not know, there are economic experts around them to understand, but in fact their hearts are to understand these The ultimate policy outcome, but they never said lips to stabilize housing prices, otherwise people have different views, but in specific policy on the real price increase for countries to take measures to support the cause of rising prices, because I ignorance, confused, can not ask people to hand too much money? or what? currency withdrawn from circulation by raising prices ?,,,, 1, inhibition of real estate investment, real estate investment compressed, and now all day in a meeting said that to curb overheated investment in real estate, real estate construction to prevent overheating of the policy, it is clear this is less investment in real estate, which is a small building a house, it reduces the housing supply, as only the house in short supply, prices can rise, more room , the price will decline, it is clear that this policy is to raise prices .2, control of land, reducing land supply, and now reports every day to compress the supply of land, (in fact they have abandoned many of the rural land matter, it is better to barren not allowed to build a house, in that person's housing land is very small, compared with the large area of land is not worth mentioning) Everyone knows that less land, higher prices, land costs have driven up house prices to promote , (a report completed in Beijing in 2006 greatly reduced residential) is more important is that high land prices, developers will be competing at high prices of land, the new , and prices will inevitably high cost of the price, increase housing costs, housing prices must increase, developers will not lose money to sell the house .3, increase taxes and fees, are continuing to adopt the tax, business tax, transfer income tax, land tax, etc. This capital increase house costs continue to increase, developers in the case of a small house, is bound to these taxes onto consumers, driving up prices .4, increase of land transfer, recently issued a document , double the land transfer, which is to improve housing costs and increase prices. It is reported that Beijing raise housing frustrated, because of high prices of land they just simply no way imposing, high land prices have become a high house prices the largest pillar, high prices inevitably cost .5, are not allowed to raise housing units, housing financing does not support it. It is obvious, all to raise funds housing, house prices are low, the people no longer buy a house developers , went to financing housing construction, the developer of the house no one to buy, they will certainly lower prices, so housing prices will come down .6. Although people can not afford to buy a house call, but absolutely no mention of policies to reduce prices, but that If house prices stabilize, or not excessive, it is evident anywhere in the world commodity prices will not and should not fall only to rise, but should fluctuate around the value of the center, with long before the normal ups and downs, but the policy This formulation of never, but never say prices should ebb, but that prices should be steady growth, which is obviously afraid of falling prices, housing prices should not only stand down. There are credit policy and so on,,,, in short, according to my analysis, the state of these policy objectives, to focus the two, one is to increase housing costs, one is to reduce the housing supply, these two control policies is very terrible, is Prices start form the root, can only be impossible for housing prices to lower prices, few people understand the economics, the general rule, they are listening to propaganda, very little rational analysis, we can not just look at how to say the newspaper publicity, And look at how to do it and achieve the effect of these practices, these policies are very clear and really practice, you can assert, from the various policy developments, the state policy in the real meaning is to support housing prices. do not know these statements inspire you to improve analytical skills that you?